Reviews of three new books on the Vietnam
war: Veteran's Day, by Rod Kane, These Good Men, by Michael
Norman and The Phantom Blooper, by Gustav Hasford
Television news may
have made Vietnam America's "living-room war," but if so, it has always
been a living room where someone kept putting out the lights and rearranging
the furniture. No matter how many television shows, books or movies get
made, the subject remains elusive, dancing in and out of our peripheral
vision. A recent trio of books, two memoirs and a novel, argue persuasively
that the trick is not unriddling Vietnam but rather learning how to live
with its memory.
Rod Kane's memoir Veteran's
Day (314 pages. Orion Books. $18. 95) describes his return from the
war in 1966 to a country that didn't want to hear him or hire him. Unable
to hold a job or maintain any emotional relationship, the former Army combat
medic drifted through a decade of alcoholism before he pulled himself together
with the help of Veterans Administration group-therapy sessions and the
dawning realization that "Vietnam, combat, is ours to deal with. No one
else back here has that experience . . . We, who have the problems because
of it, are the ones who can solve it."
Kane is often self-indulgent
and amateurish--in fact, he can be a slob of a writer--but he'll try anything.
When he describes what battle is like and how the memory plays on for years,
troubling sleepand waking moments alike, he writes well enough to put sweat
on your palms.
Michael Norman, a former
New York Times reporter and a far more professional writer than Kane, can't
touch him when it comes to making scenes and people live on the page. Norman
worries too much about smoothing away the rough edges of his story. But
These Good Men (310 pages. Crown Publishers. $19.95) pairs well
with Veteran's Day. A Marine in Vietnam during 1968-69, Norman saw
19 of the 110 men in his company killed and 30 wounded in three days of
heavy fighting at Bridge 28 below Khe Sanh in April 1968. Sixteen years
later he set out to find the survivors of his platoon, to see, as he puts
it, what "verities" they brought back from battle.
Some came home with
physical scars. Others were damaged more obscurely. Everyone paid. But
as Norman crisscrossed the country, tracking down his buddies, he discovered
that "time and distance aside, we were still a circle, our places held
by memory, each a part of each." As one of the men says, "Men don't talk
about love very well as far as men loving other men. But when it comes
down to it, I've loved more men than women."
These Good Men
is really about the consolations of friendship, and if it ends affirmatively,
it is never foolish, because Norman understands the irony of his territory:
that love as intense and lasting as anything produced in peacetime should
arise out of the awful circumstances of war.
Novelist Gustav Hasford's
vision leaves no room for healing. His protagonist, Marine Private Joker,
first met in Hasford's earlier, superb novel The Short-Timers--on
which director Stanley Kubrick based Full Metal Jacket--can only
mourn what's gone, the "men who died not at a place but at a grid coordinate,
scattered bones now, torn apart by tigers and eaten by ants. I want to
live with the tigers and the ants. I want to be with my friends."
The Phanton Blooper
(243 pages. Bantam Books. $17.95) begins in the last surreal days of Khe
Sanh and moves on to the year Joker spends as a Viet Cong prisoner in 1968-69,
experiencing the war from the other side in a primitive village with no
electricity, "no billboards, no plumbing, no telephone poles, no restaurants,
no ice, no ice cream, no television, no freeways, no pickup trucks, no
frozen pizza."
Rescued, hospitalized
and then sent home, Joker finds himself unfit for civilian life. He is
literally a phantom, fueled by anger and a keen if cockeyed eye for life's
lunatic moments: a Viet Cong soldier assiduously reading Dale Carnegie
in French; his own mother, moments after watching her son pull a gun on
his stupid stepfather at the dinner table, muttering distractedly, "There's
banana pudding for dessert."
The real "eye" here,
of course, belongs to Hasford, like Joker a combat correspondent who with
equal facility can describe a hospital ward crowded with paraplegics, a
Viet Cong indoctrination class and an Alabama supper table. This furious
yet compassionate book, though not as tautly focused as The Short-Timers,
is in every other way its equal. Hasford doesn't believe in happy endings,
but he does believe in keeping faith with the truth, however ugly, as a
means of salvation. "I'd rather be killed in a war than be bored to death
an inch at a time," Joker says at the end of his story. "In the village
of Hoa Binh I was free. I was not a helpless pawn. I had a future. I had
friends who could be trusted. War is real and men need reality like they
need air and food."
Copyright of Newsweek
